Here is a quote from the above article (the emphasis in text is my own):
More than 100,000 Australian investors have $11 billion in three frozen La Trobe Financial funds that the corporate regulator believes may have made high-risk loans to property developers that were marketed as safe bets.
On Monday, the firm’s chief investment officer, Chris Paton, told investors in its property-focused Australian credit fund there was little to worry about, even though the asset manager has cut off access to the website used by clients to access their investments.
So, not peanuts folks. That’s $11 billion with a B.
Not only that, but the profile of investors is a worry. It’s mainly retirees who are looking to maximize their income who are most attracted by these funds. And in one aspect, I can’t really blame them. We just witnessed the US Fed cut US interest rates with guidance that they will continue to cut. Other central banks are or are considering doing the same.
With inflation not going away, leaving your money in savings accounts is simply a losing formula in an easing environment. Therefore if you need a certain level of income for living expenses, you are compelled to make those savings work harder for you.
It is this exact market that funds like Latrobe are addressing. But look again at what CIO Chris Paton said above: there’s nothing to worry about. The regulator, ASIC, sees it differently. It is claiming instead that client funds are being moved into high-risk loans to developers.
How does Paton explain his confidence? Bolded text is my own.
“I want to reassure our investors that your investments with La Trobe financial remain safe and under our careful stewardship,” Mr Paton said. “Each of our products are supported by high-quality granular loan assets within highly diversified portfolios that are built with conservatism at their core.”
Do you know what a high-quality granular loan asset is? Do you think those retirees know what it is? No point asking me, I have zero idea.
Is this the reason why $11 billion worth of client funds are tied up with this or is it more to do with the ‘risk-free’ 6-10% p.a return on offer?
I think I know which.
It speaks to a lack of due diligence and taking the time to correctly vet the disclosure statements of these funds. Yes, Latrobe in this instance is still paying the monthly stipend to clients but I do notice their ASX-listed private credit fund is in a trading halt (ASX ticker: LF1).
Frankly, I believe these funds are now almost too complex for the average retail investor to truly understand the risks they are taking on. But also consider the fact over $200 billion is estimated to be invested in the total private credit market here in Australia.
Do you think there’s some vested interest at play in both getting and then keeping that money for the long term? To be deliberately opaque about the risks and what precisely are your monies invested in on your behalf?
This speaks to the heart of the matter, and why ASIC feels compelled to act.
ASIC has warned on the risks about two La Trobe funds that lend to Australian business borrowers on the basis their advertising may not be consistent with the regulator’s requirements.
“These products are not bank deposits,” ASIC said in its statement. “The rates of return are not guaranteed and are determined by future revenue of the pool of assets that comprise the account…. and there are conditions around withdrawals.”
Ah yes, “conditions.”
Prepare yourself now to be completely shocked.