One of the most persistent inhibitors to the US Fed’s planned interest rate cuts was the fact core inflation remained higher than the range-bound goal of 2%. As the chart shows, should the data prove resilient, we are already there, if not moved lower than 2%.
Such data of course shaped the recent speech by US Fed Chairman Jerome Powell in a speech on August 23rd.
“The time has come for policy to adjust. The direction of travel is clear, and the timing and pace of rate cuts will depend on incoming data, the evolving outlook, and the balance of risks…..
…..The current level of our policy rate gives us ample room to respond to any risks we may face, including the risk of unwelcome further weakening in labor market conditions. ”
I’ve written to you here before, and readers of both Phil’s and Akhil’s books would know, that one harbinger of the upcoming peak is when we are all-in, with no capacity left to borrow and no liquid assets remaining to place into the stock market.
Do we have here the set-up of which both authors speak? Are we about to hit the peak of the current real estate cycle?
Did PSE get its timing, whisper it now, wrong?
Do you still have those real estate cycle lenses on?
How a few missing words can change everything.
Something you are going to have learn to do, unless you’re a natural already at it, is to be skeptical about what you read and hear from now on.
Go back now and relook at that first X post. At face value, a single chart with no explanation of how the data was sourced with hyperbolic headlines is hardly prima facia evidence to me.
And yet, this represents how the most important financial and economic news is disseminated today. Via a single post, a single graph or table and a clickbait headline. The importance of this is paramount; this time last completed real estate cycle there was NO social media platforms.
There is no precedent for just how quickly news spreads today. And almost none of it is designed to educate. So when people online start throwing numbers around, even spending 10 minutes of research to find corroborating evidence can be fruitful. For instance, start by asking “but is that really the case?”
I quickly discovered that the claim “US allocation to stocks hit 57% of total, near the highest level ever recorded” is missing one crucial piece of context. JP Morgan, one of the biggest banks on earth when it comes to investment markets, happened to have released a note to their investors last week.
Here is how they reported the same ‘fact’. Bolded text is my own.
“The wealthiest 5% of US households poured even more cash into the stock market, allocating 57% of their investments to stocks, 8% to cash, and 23% to fixed income.”
So, that rules out the remaining 95% of US households then.
But Darren, as you’ve shown yourself, US stock markets are on an absolute tear lately? Yes; I agree. But if I may provide a small amount of context? If you study markets, you’ll have heard of the term ‘rotation’ when it comes to liquid assets such as stocks, bonds and the like.
At the start of August we witnessed the markets when they forgot their medication. The USD/Yen carry trade unwound at a violent rate, as the below table demonstrates.